Apterygida albipennis

Enter

SignUp

Catalogue » Insecta » Dermaptera » Forficulidae » Apterygida » Apterygida albipennis (Megerle, 1825) «« »»

Apterygida albipennis (Megerle, 1825)

Stage:

Larva/Nymph

Sex:

< N/A >

# 8832

22.07.2008

50°02'33.24"N 36°16'39.72"E (50.042568,36.277699)

г. Харьков, Лесопарк

Published: 24.07.2008 07:37:23 Date/time taken: 22.07.2008 04:05:41 (exif)

Make:	Canon
Model:	Canon PowerShot A640
Orientation:	1: Normal (0 deg)
X Resolution:	72 dots per ResolutionUnit
Y Resolution:	72 dots per ResolutionUnit
Resolution Unit:	Inch
Exposure Time:	1/1000 sec (1/1000 sec; 0.001 sec)
F Number:	f/8
Exif Version:	version 2,2
Date Time Original:	22.07.2008 04:05:41
Shutter Speed Value:	17/17035 sec (1/1002 sec; 0.001 sec)
Aperture Value:	f/8
Exposure Bias Value:	0 EV
Max Aperture Value:	f/4,1
Metering Mode:	Multi-Segment
Flash:	Compulsory Flash
Focal Length:	29,2 mm
Color Space:	sRGB
Sensing Method:	Unknown: One Chip Color Area Sensor
File Source:	Digital Still Camera
White Balance:	1
Digital Zoom Ratio:	1x
Compression:	Jpeg Compression

Identification keys: Insecta

More images of this object - 2:

Taxon

Determination

Date / Time

Member

Apterygida albipennis (Megerle, 1825) (Larva/Nymph)

Arp

01.05.2012 07:37:56

barry

? Forficulidae (Larva/Nymph)

DeVonian (Vassili =v= Belov)

31.10.2011 10:46:03

barry

Forficulidae (Larva/Nymph)

DeVonian (Vassili =v= Belov)

02.01.2010 06:44:36

DeVonian

Last edited:

07.06.2014 08:26:27 (barry)

File name:

IMG_1358.JPG (IMG_13580.JPG)

File size:

148,94 kb

Resolution:

800 x 600 px

MD5:

2f4ab6633d23be53fc2ddd77649d7dac

Comments: 4

	01.05.2012 01:48:24: Arp
	Hi Boris, Looks very much like Apterygida media (nymph) I tried adding an ID to genus for some pictures, but after specifying family and genus and pressing [Add] the new ID comes back at family level, not at genus level ... is this by design?

	01.05.2012 07:34:15: barry
	This particular implementation (in my database). Genus does not exist as a separate category in the taxonomy. Photo can not bind to the genus (only to family or species). In this case, we add the "Genus sp." in the list of species. Maybe it's wrong or uncomfortable, I think on this issue, it is difficult to implementation... Write a comment about this case I will add ... although it may be easier to me to make an automatic addition of Genus sp. for this case? :)

	01.05.2012 11:43:58 (01.05.2012 11:44:18): Arp
	Hi Boris, If it is not possible to bind an image to genus only, I think that it would be a perfect idea/workaround to add Genus sp. to all genera. For some that will be overkill (if there is only one species in the genus), but in general it will be a good way to enable ID to genus level. For this ID: I really think the currently valid name is Apterygida media (Hagenbach 1822), which also makes sense seeing the publication dates. That said, I cannot be 100% certain of the ID here as I don't know all Ukrain/Russian species, and certainly not their nymphs, but the habitus, hairs (also on the forceps), development level of wingstubs etc are all typical for A. media.

	03.05.2012 06:57:36 (03.05.2012 06:57:52): barry
	I'm in the Crimea, 4...8 May.

<... You are not logged in. Log in or register to leave comments ...>

Online: 744 unregistered users